DOE ends climate grant program as questions rise over political influence

• DOE terminates $7.5B in climate grants, citing economic non-viability and poor taxpayer ROI, while whistleblowers allege funds were diverted to Democrat election interference operations.
• Critics claim grants were partisan tools, financing ballot harvesting, activist networks, and voter roll manipulation—mirroring past USAID scandals—while Democrats defend them as vital for clean energy.
• Insiders suggest political motives, with grants disproportionately flowing to blue states, fueling suspicions of a Democrat slush fund disguised as climate initiatives.
• Republicans hail the cancellation, calling it a win against the “Green New Scam,” accusing Biden of weaponizing climate policy to fund left-wing judicial and election campaigns.
• Watchdogs demand investigations, questioning misuse of taxpayer dollars, as the move signals a GOP push for fiscal accountability amid deepening partisan divides over climate spending.

$7.5 Billion in Climate Grants Canceled Amid Allegations of Election Interference

The Department of Energy (DOE) has abruptly terminated $7.5 billion in climate-related grants, citing economic non-viability and poor returns on taxpayer investments. However, whistleblowers allege these funds were funneled into Democrat-controlled regions to finance ballot-harvesting operations, activist networks, and voter roll manipulation—mirroring past controversies involving USAID slush funds.

Critics argue the grants functioned less as environmental initiatives and more as partisan election interference tools. Fiscal conservatives applaud the move as part of broader GOP efforts to dismantle what they call “Green New Scam” programs tied to progressive agendas. Meanwhile, Democrats defend the grants as essential for clean energy progress, accusing Republicans of sabotaging climate solutions for political gain.

Economic Non-Viability or Political Cover?

The DOE stated the grants were canceled after a “thorough financial review” determined they failed to advance national energy needs or provide a positive return on investment. Yet insiders claim the real motive was to halt a system allegedly exploited to bankroll left-wing political operations under the guise of climate activism.

“The Democrats use climate grant money as slush fund money to rig elections,” said one analyst. “It’s never about the climate—it’s about funding their political machine.”

Reports indicate many grants disproportionately flowed into blue states, raising suspicions of deliberate allocation to bolster Democratic strongholds. Similar patterns have emerged in past scandals, where taxpayer-funded programs were allegedly repurposed for partisan voter mobilization efforts.

Broader GOP Push Against “Green New Scam”

Russ Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), hailed the cancellation, calling it a victory against “nearly $8 billion in Green New Scam funding to fuel the left’s climate agenda.” Critics argue the Biden administration weaponized climate policy to consolidate political power, using grants to subsidize activist groups, judicial influence campaigns, and election infrastructure.

The decision underscores deepening political divides over climate spending, with Republicans pushing for accountability while Democrats warn of setbacks in renewable energy development. As the 2024 election looms, the controversy highlights concerns over federal funds being leveraged for partisan advantage—raising questions about transparency and misuse of taxpayer dollars.

What’s Next?

With the grants axed, watchdog groups demand investigations into how funds were allocated and whether they were diverted for political purposes. As debates over climate policy intensify, the DOE’s move signals a broader shift toward fiscal scrutiny—and a potential reckoning for programs critics argue prioritize ideology over genuine environmental solutions.

For now, the cancellation stands as a win for fiscal conservatives—but the battle over climate funding and its alleged political misuse is far from over.

Watch the Oct. 3 episode of “Brighteon Broadcast News” as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks about Billions in climate grants CANCELED, cutting off Democrat slush fund money.

This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Scientists scramble to remove DEI language from grant renewal applications amid funding fears

Climate crisis continues — in leftist echo chamber: New York Times hosts climate conference—no dissent allowed

IRS grants tax reprieve to farmers amid historic droughts, extending relief for livestock sales

Sources include:

Brighteon.com