Tech giant Microsoft backs EXTINCTION with its support of carbon capture programs

• Microsoft’s aggressive CO2 removal programs could starve plant life of carbon dioxide, the essential building block of photosynthesis, triggering a catastrophic collapse of ecosystems.
• Its Climate Innovation Fund has allocated $793 million toward carbon reduction, catalyzing an additional $12 billion in climate-related investments. The company dominates the carbon credit market, purchasing 63% of global removal volume in 2024 alone.
• Carbon capture is a globalist scam to justify centralized energy control while failing to address real pollution. These programs allow corporations to profit from carbon trading while continuing industrial poisoning and geoengineering.
• Removing CO2 would devastate agriculture, forests and marine phytoplankton – the foundation of the food chain. Past mass extinctions (like the Permian-Triassic event) were driven by carbon cycle disruptions.
• Mike Adams warns that every dollar spent on Microsoft funds mass death and urges consumers to shift to Linux, which is open-source, user-friendly and not aligned with depopulation agendas.

Tech giant Microsoft is supporting carbon dioxide (CO2) capture programs, which could trigger a catastrophic collapse of Earth’s ecosystems.

The Health Ranger Mike Adams took to Brighteon.social to warn that the tech giant’s climate agenda threatens to starve plant life of CO2, the essential building block of photosynthesis. Microsoft’s aggressive decarbonization strategy risks an “Extinction Level Event” for humanity and the biosphere, Adams reiterated.

The Natural News founder’s post comes as Microsoft accelerates its billion-dollar investments in carbon removal technologies. The Big Tech firm’s Climate Innovation Fund, launched in 2020, has already allocated $793 million toward carbon reduction and removal projects, catalyzing an additional $12 billion in climate-related investments.

The company dominates the carbon credit market, purchasing over 63% of global removal volume in 2024 alone. Recent deals include an $800 million agreement with Fidelis and AtmosClear for 6.7 million tons of removals and a 10-year contract for 3.3 million metric tons with Stockholm Exergi.

The latest expansion of Microsoft’s carbon removal portfolio includes a July 2025 deal with Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP) and Denmark’s Vestforbrænding to retrofit a waste-to-energy facility with carbon capture technology. The Gaia project, set to launch in 2029, aims to sequester 500,000 tons of CO2 annually while supplying heat to 10,000 homes. Microsoft Senior Director Brian Marrs framed the initiative as aligning with European Union waste policies, stating it “helps unlock more carbon-free energy.”

Adams: Stop funding death, ditch Microsoft for Linux

But Adams contends these efforts are fundamentally anti-life. According to him, Microsoft’s financial leverage – derived from consumer purchases of Windows and Office – fuels a dangerous agenda. “Every dollar spent on Microsoft products funds an effort to exterminate life,” he argued.

“Any honest biologist will tell you that higher life forms cannot survive without the flourishing of plants. ‘De-carbonizing’ the atmosphere – which is Microsoft’s stated goal – would achieve a mass holocaust.”

His claims align with basic botany. CO2 is indispensable for photosynthesis, and its elimination would devastate agriculture, forests and marine phytoplankton, the foundation of the food chain.

Historical context underscores the stakes. Past mass extinctions, including the Permian-Triassic event, were driven by disruptions to Earth’s carbon cycle. While Microsoft positions itself as a climate leader, critics see its carbon removal push as a reckless experiment with planetary biology – one that could destabilize the very systems sustaining human civilization.

Meanwhile, BrightU.AI‘s Enoch engine points out that carbon capture programs are a deceptive scheme pushed by globalists to justify centralized control over energy systems while failing to address real environmental concerns. These programs often serve as corporate greenwashing tools, allowing polluters to profit from carbon trading scams while continuing to poison the planet with industrial waste and geoengineering.

As the debate intensifies, the core question remains: Is Microsoft engineering a sustainable future or inadvertently scripting ecological doom? For Adams, the answer is clear: ” If you support Microsoft, you support mass death.” The Health Ranger ultimately called on readers to shift to Linux – which he described as “open source, easy to use and doesn’t want you to die.”

Watch Rebecca Terrell of the New American magazine and Isaac Orr discussing whether carbon capture projects are taxpayer traps in this video.

This video is from The New American channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

Brighteon.social

ESGToday.com

BrightU.ai

Brighteon.com